IN RE WHITE

OSB 86-25, 87-34/SC S37007.

815 P.2d 1257 (1991)

311 Or. 573

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Craig D. WHITE.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided July 25, 1991.

Reconsideration Denied September 24, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Bishop, Portland, argued the cause, for the accused. With him on the briefs, was Craig D. White, pro se.

Susan K. Roedl, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief, on behalf of the Or. State Bar.


PER CURIAM.

The Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violations of several different Disciplinary Rules. The trial panel found him guilty of 11 violations and decided that he should be disbarred. The accused seeks review. We review the record de novo. ORS 9.536(3); BR 10.6. The Bar has the burden of establishing ethical misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. BR 5.2.

The Bar alleges that the accused violated the following standards of professional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases